ASUS ZenScreen 27"
ASUS
69 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Samsung
93 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Office
Creative
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Portable
Specifiche
| ASUS ZenScreen 27" | Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 500 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 5 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | 99% (CIE1976) |
| Color Depth | 10-bit | 10-bit |
| HDR | HDR10+ | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | HDR10+ | HDR10+ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1 | 3★ |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Power | 30W★ | 140W |
| Weight | 6.00 kg★ | 6.90 kg |
Pro e Contro
ASUS ZenScreen 27"
- Strong color (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong display (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong feature (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong portability (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average performance (23rd percentile)
- Below average social proof (33rd percentile)
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
Prezzi
ASUS ZenScreen 27"0.010punteggio per dollaro
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 20250.007punteggio per dollaro
ASUS ZenScreen 27" offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.4x migliore
ASUS ZenScreen 27"
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Verdetto
Vincitore: Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27"
Scores 93 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 28 specs.
