ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 31.5" 2025
ASUS
94 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3818DW 38" Black 2018
Dell
46 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Creative
Professional
Office
Entertainment
Gaming
Portable
Specifiche
| ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 31.5" | Dell UltraSharp U3818DW 38" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 31.5" | 38" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 1600 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.10000000149011612 ms★ | 5 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | Adaptive-Sync | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 300 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 100% sRGB, 99% DCI-P3 | — |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| HDR | HDR10/Dolby Vision/Hybrid Log Ga | — |
| HDR Support | Dolby Vision | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 0 | 1★ |
| USB-C | 2★ | — |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | — |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | — |
| Pivot | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power | 31W★ | 56W |
| Weight | 9.00 kg★ | 12.11 kg |
Pro e Contro
ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 31.5" 2025
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong display (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong color (92th percentile)92th %ile
Dell UltraSharp U3818DW 38" Black 2018
- Strong display (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong connectivity (67th percentile)
- Below average social proof (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average performance (22th percentile)
- Below average compact (25th percentile)
Prezzi
ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 31.5" 20250.003punteggio per dollaro
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3818DW 38" Black 20180.001punteggio per dollaro
ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 31.5" 2025 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 3.0x migliore
ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 31.5" 2025
Dell UltraSharp U3818DW 38" Black 2018
Verdetto
Vincitore: ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 31.5"
Scores 94 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 28 specs.
