ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG 31.5" Black 2025
ASUS
88 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Samsung Odyssey G30D 27" Black 2024
Samsung
73 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Gaming
Professional
Office
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Specifiche
| ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG 31.5" | Samsung Odyssey G30D 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 31.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | IPS★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 160 Hz | 180 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 0.30000001192092896 ms★ | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium★ | FreeSync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 400 nits★ | 250 nits |
| Color Gamut | 95% DCI-P3 | 95% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 8-bit (8-Bit+FRC) | 8-bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| HDR Support | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1★ | 0 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 30W★ | 35W |
| Weight | 9.90 kg | 4.40 kg★ |
Pro e Contro
ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG 31.5" Black 2025
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong performance (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong color (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
Samsung Odyssey G30D 27" Black 2024
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong performance (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong feature (72th percentile)
- Below average compact (32th percentile)
Prezzi
ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG 31.5" Black 20250.007punteggio per dollaro
vs
Samsung Odyssey G30D 27" Black 20240.014punteggio per dollaro
Samsung Odyssey G30D 27" Black 2024 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 2.0x migliore
ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG 31.5" Black 2025
Samsung Odyssey G30D 27" Black 2024
Verdetto
Vincitore: ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG 31.5"
Scores 88 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 28 specs.
