Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm

Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm

Canon
43 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Macro
Panasonic
96
Canon
44
Budget
Panasonic
92
Canon
36
Landscape
Panasonic
90
Canon
54
Travel
Panasonic
90
Canon
35
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Canon
36
Professional
Panasonic
86
Canon
49
Portrait
Panasonic
84
Canon
35
Street
Panasonic
83
Canon
36
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
82
Canon
33

Specifiche

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mmCanon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm
Optics
Typezoomtilt-shift
Focal Length Min28 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm17 mm
Elements1718
Groups1312
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements44
CoatingFluorine coatingSubwavelength Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-7.1f/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades98
Build
MountL-MountCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.41 kg0.82 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusmanual focus only
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm250 mm
Max Magnification0.5x0.14x

Pro e Contro

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm

  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong social proof (69th percentile)
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Prezzi

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm

No current pricing available

Verdetto

Vincitore: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche