Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
78 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Budget
Nikon
78
Sony
100
Street
Nikon
67
Sony
89
Travel
Nikon
55
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
56
Sony
84
Video Cinema
Nikon
75
Sony
83
Macro
Nikon
83
Sony
71
Portrait
Nikon
72
Sony
82
Landscape
Nikon
65
Sony
77
Professional
Nikon
69
Sony
73

Specifiche

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VRSony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm135 mm
Elements1716
Groups1212
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements22
CoatingNano Crystal Coat—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/3.5
Min Aperturef/43.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon FSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weight0.68 kg0.33 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave MotorLinear motor★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops2.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance290 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification1:4★0.29x

Pro e Contro

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (77th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Strong stabilization (74th percentile)

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Verdetto

★ Vincitore: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Migliore per:

Macro

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Migliore per:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports