Sigma 185955

Sigma 185955

Sigma
40 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
80 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Macro
Sigma
40
Nikon
78
Budget
Sigma
35
Nikon
78
Portrait
Sigma
28
Nikon
78
Video Cinema
Sigma
42
Nikon
76
Professional
Sigma
45
Nikon
73
Street
Sigma
33
Nikon
68
Landscape
Sigma
47
Nikon
66
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
42
Nikon
59
Travel
Sigma
33
Nikon
58

Specifiche

Sigma 185955Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Optics
Typesuper-telephotozoom
Focal Length Min500 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm35 mm
Elements1617
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements03
ED Elements32
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingNano Crystal Coat
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/4
Min Aperturef/4f/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon FNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight3.17 kg0.68 kg
Filter Thread46 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMSilent Wave Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops2.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance3.50 m290 mm
Max Magnification0.15x1:4

Pro e Contro

Sigma 185955

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (75th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average macro (27th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong stabilization (75th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (74th percentile)

Prezzi

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

No current pricing available

Verdetto

Vincitore: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Scores 80 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports