Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Neewer 2-in-1 Wide Angle & Macro Lens LS-24 18-75mm

Neewer 2-in-1 Wide Angle & Macro Lens LS-24 18-75mm

Neewer
45 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Portrait
Sigma
59
Neewer
66
Street
Sigma
46
Neewer
57
Budget
Sigma
56
Neewer
49
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Neewer
55
Professional
Sigma
42
Neewer
55
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Neewer
46
Travel
Sigma
40
Neewer
45
Landscape
Sigma
33
Neewer
45
Macro
Sigma
16
Neewer
28

Specifiche

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSNeewer 2-in-1 Wide Angle & Macro Lens LS-24 18-75mm
Optics
Typemacro
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm75 mm
CoatingMulti layer Nano Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.8
Constant
Build
MountCanon EF
Weight0.31 kg
Focus
Max Magnification10x

Pro e Contro

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Neewer 2-in-1 Wide Angle & Macro Lens LS-24 18-75mm

  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong build (67th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile

Verdetto

Pareggio

Both products are closely matched - Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS wins 0 specs while Neewer 2-in-1 Wide Angle & Macro Lens LS-24 18-75mm wins 2.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Migliore per:

Budget

Neewer 2-in-1 Wide Angle & Macro Lens LS-24 18-75mm Migliore per:

MacroStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports