Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC IF Aspherical Zoom

Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC IF Aspherical Zoom

Sigma
60 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Professional
Nikon
89
Sigma
47
Macro
Nikon
88
Sigma
68
Budget
Nikon
85
Sigma
58
Street
Nikon
84
Sigma
55
Portrait
Nikon
84
Sigma
60
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sigma
53
Landscape
Nikon
79
Sigma
45
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Sigma
48
Travel
Nikon
70
Sigma
50

Specifiche

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC IF Aspherical Zoom
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm125 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg0.39 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★—
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm125 mm★
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pro e Contro

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC IF Aspherical Zoom

  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (13th percentile)13th %ile

Prezzi

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC IF Aspherical Zoom

No current pricing available

Verdetto

★ Vincitore: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche