Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Rokinon AF IO1424AFZ-E 24mm

Rokinon AF IO1424AFZ-E 24mm

Rokinon
58 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Professional
Nikon
95
Rokinon
69
Portrait
Nikon
89
Rokinon
43
Street
Nikon
86
Rokinon
57
Budget
Nikon
86
Rokinon
54
Macro
Nikon
85
Rokinon
71
Landscape
Nikon
83
Rokinon
72
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Rokinon
55
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Rokinon
62
Travel
Nikon
75
Rokinon
60

Specifiche

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Rokinon AF IO1424AFZ-E 24mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm14 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm24 mm
Elements1315
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements33
CoatingMulti-CoatedUMC
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorLinear STM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm180 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:3.85

Pro e Contro

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Rokinon AF IO1424AFZ-E 24mm

  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Prezzi

Rokinon AF IO1424AFZ-E 24mm is 3.240 MXN cheaper (1.2x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.004punteggio per dollaro
vs
Rokinon AF IO1424AFZ-E 24mm0.003punteggio per dollaro

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.3x migliore

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Rokinon AF IO1424AFZ-E 24mm

Verdetto

Vincitore: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche