Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Viltrox
70 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Meike 35mm f/1.7 35mm

Meike 35mm f/1.7 35mm

Meike
39 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Street
Viltrox
75
Meike
36
Portrait
Viltrox
69
Meike
29
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
68
Meike
32
Budget
Viltrox
66
Meike
36
Macro
Viltrox
59
Meike
24
Professional
Viltrox
59
Meike
32
Travel
Viltrox
59
Meike
46
Landscape
Viltrox
57
Meike
34
Video Cinema
Viltrox
56
Meike
25

Specifiche

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mmMeike 35mm f/1.7 35mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min56 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm35 mm
Elements116
Groups95
ED Elements4
CoatingHD nano-coatingMulti-Layer Nano Coating
Aperture
Max Aperture1622
Min Aperture1.71.7
Constant
Diaphragm Blades98
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.17 kg0.18 kg
Filter Thread52 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMmanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm300 mm
Max Magnification1:9.090.111x

Pro e Contro

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (68th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Meike 35mm f/1.7 35mm

  • Strong build (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong social proof (71th percentile)
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23th percentile)
  • Below average macro (24th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (25th percentile)

Prezzi

Meike 35mm f/1.7 35mm is 1.335 MXN cheaper (2.0x less).

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm0.026punteggio per dollaro
vs
Meike 35mm f/1.7 35mm0.030punteggio per dollaro

Meike 35mm f/1.7 35mm offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.2x migliore

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Meike 35mm f/1.7 35mm

Verdetto

Vincitore: Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Scores 70 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 20 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche