Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z

Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z

Canon
78 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Budget
Nikon
86
Canon
80
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Canon
82
Landscape
Nikon
68
Canon
82
Professional
Nikon
66
Canon
79
Portrait
Nikon
79
Canon
57
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
65
Canon
77
Street
Nikon
75
Canon
63
Macro
Nikon
73
Canon
64
Travel
Nikon
71
Canon
72

Specifiche

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmCanon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm105 mm
Elements23
Groups18
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements24
CoatingSuper Integrated CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades711
Build
MountNikon FCanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.48 kg1.31 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SNano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm450 mm
Max Magnification0.29x

Pro e Contro

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z

  • Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average build (24th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Verdetto

Vincitore: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetPortrait

Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z Migliore per:

LandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports