Tamron Di II AF014P-700 18-200mm

Tamron Di II AF014P-700 18-200mm

Tamron
58 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sony
89 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Travel
Tamron
55
Sony
94
Budget
Tamron
67
Sony
91
Street
Tamron
46
Sony
90
Video Cinema
Tamron
52
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
50
Sony
84
Landscape
Tamron
46
Sony
79
Portrait
Tamron
34
Sony
77
Professional
Tamron
44
Sony
77
Macro
Tamron
72
Sony
68

Specifiche

Tamron Di II AF014P-700 18-200mmSony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min18 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm50 mm
Elements—9
Groups—8
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—1★
Aperture
Max Aperturef/18f/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-6.33.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.40 kg0.11 kg★
Filter Thread—41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping motor★Autofocus
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance18 mm★250 mm
Max Magnification—0.215x★

Pro e Contro

Tamron Di II AF014P-700 18-200mm

  • Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (32nd percentile)

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Prezzi

Tamron Di II AF014P-700 18-200mm

No current pricing available

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Verdetto

★ Vincitore: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di II AF014P-700 18-200mm Migliore per:

Macro

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm Migliore per:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche