Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

Sigma
52 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Budget
Sigma
50
Canon
97
Portrait
Sigma
67
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Sigma
52
Canon
90
Street
Sigma
52
Canon
82
Travel
Sigma
29
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
42
Canon
77
Landscape
Sigma
37
Canon
76
Professional
Sigma
46
Canon
75
Macro
Sigma
46
Canon
68

Specifiche

Sigma Sports 185956 500mmCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min500 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm135 mm
Elements1616
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements1
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/3.5
Min Aperturef/323.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountSigma SACanon EF-S
FormatFull-FrameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight3.17 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread46 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance3.50 m390 mm
Max Magnification1:6.670.28x

Pro e Contro

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong optical (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average macro (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Verdetto

Vincitore: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports