Focal Celestee FCELESTEE
Focal
48 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Beyerdynamic
87 Punteggio complessivo
Cosa dicono gli acquirenti
Focal Celestee FCELESTEE
92 su 100 affidabilità bassa 6 recensioni
Le cuffie Focal Celestee sono elogiate per la loro eccezionale chiarezza sonora e capacità di rivelare dettagli mai sentiti prima, offrendo un'esperienza musicale coinvolgente. Gli utenti apprezzano l'equilibrio tra bassi, medi e alti, ma notano la necessità di un DAC e il cavo in dotazione piuttosto corto.
Pro
- Chiarezza sonora eccezionale
- Risposta in frequenza bilanciata
- Comfort di vestibilità
- Design bellissimo
- Rivela nuove sfumature
Contro
- Cavo incluso corto
- Richiede DAC per il pieno potenziale
- Prezzo elevato
Sound quality 6
Detail retrieval 5
Build quality 3
Comfort 2
Cable length 2
Dac requirement 2
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Nessun feedback dei clienti ancora
Punteggi
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
Specifiche
| Focal Celestee FCELESTEE | Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.16 kg★ | 0.22 kg |
| Ear Cushion | semi-aniline leather | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | leather on the outside with microfiber on the inside | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 45 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 23 kHz★ | 22 kHz |
| Impedance | 35 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
Pro e Contro
Focal Celestee FCELESTEE
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong comfort (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Strong sound (66th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
Prezzi
Focal Celestee FCELESTEE0.002punteggio per dollaro
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.025punteggio per dollaro
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 12.5x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Scores 87 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 39 specs.
