Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Apple
96 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Jxrev Wireless
Jxrev
38 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Budget
Commute
Travel
Fitness
Calls
Gaming
Music
Specifiche
| Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A | Jxrev Wireless | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | XXS, XS, S, M, L | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 13 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | SBC, AAC |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | Adaptive Audio | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | HSP, HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, AAC |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 1 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time | 10 min for 2 hours playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs | 40 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 4★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | voice assistants |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IP57 | IP7 |
Pro e Contro
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Jxrev Wireless
- Strong mic (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong battery (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong sound (78th percentile)
- Strong connectivity (71th percentile)
- Below average social proof (21th percentile)
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Verdetto
Vincitore: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 32 specs.