Apple SweetFlow

Apple SweetFlow

Apple
49 Punteggio complessivo
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Gaming
Apple
40
TOZO
80
Budget
Apple
55
TOZO
80
Travel
Apple
27
TOZO
74
Fitness
Apple
50
TOZO
72
Commute
Apple
27
TOZO
70
Music
Apple
33
TOZO
68
Calls
Apple
31
TOZO
65

Specifiche

Apple SweetFlowTOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Stylerounded_tiptrue wireless
Ear TipslMedium
Weight0.01 kg★0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Drivers1★—
Freq Min—20 Hz★
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity—100 dB★
Hi-Res Audio—✓★
Codecs—LDAC
Noise Control
ANC✗✓★
ANC Type—hybrid
Transparency—✓★
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth—5.4★
Multipoint—✓★
Wired ConnectorLightning—
Range—10 m★
Earbud Battery
Battery Life—7 hrs★
Charge Time—2 hrs★
Fast Charging—10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingLightningUSB-C★
Case Battery
Case Battery—35 hrs★
Case ChargingLightningUSB-C★
Wireless Charging—✓★
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count—4★
NC Mic—✓★
Features
Voice AssistantSiriOther
Touch Controls✗✓★
AppiOSTOZO App
Gaming Mode—✓★
Bone Conduction—✗
Water ResistanceWater-ResistantIPX5

Pro e Contro

Apple SweetFlow

  • Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong build (73rd percentile)
  • Strong connectivity (67th percentile)
  • Below average battery (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average sound (32nd percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong mic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Verdetto

★ Vincitore: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 37 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Migliore per:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness