Samsung QET QE50T 50"
Samsung
43 Score global
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 2023
Dell
90 Score global
Scores
Office
Entertainment
Professional
Creative
Gaming
Portable
Spécifications
| Samsung QET QE50T 50" | Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 50" | 34.1" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3440 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | LCD | IPS★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curved | — | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,900 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 8 ms | 5 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 16.7 Million Colors (8-Bit) | 98% DCI-P3, 100% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 8-bit | 8-Bit+FRC |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 4★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | — | ✓★ |
| Swivel | — | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 200x200 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Power | 95W | 32W★ |
| Weight | 11.70 kg | 10.81 kg★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Samsung QET QE50T 50"
- Strong display (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average performance (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
- Below average portability (25th percentile)
- Below average ergonomic (35th percentile)
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 2023
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong portability (87th percentile)87th %ile
Prix
Samsung QET QE50T 50"0.002score par dollar
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 20230.005score par dollar
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 2023 offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.5x meilleur
Samsung QET QE50T 50"
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 2023
Verdict
Gagnant: Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1"
Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 29 specs.
