Laowa Zero-D 15mm f/2 FE 15mm
Laowa
33 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
Nikon
75 Score global
Scores
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Budget
Travel
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Spécifications
| Laowa Zero-D 15mm f/2 FE 15mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 15 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 15 mm | 400 mm |
| Elements | — | 21 |
| Groups | — | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2 | 22-45★ |
| Min Aperture | — | 4-8 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Nikon Z |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.72 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | STM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 200 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:2.86★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Laowa Zero-D 15mm f/2 FE 15mm
- Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
- Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Verdict
Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
Scores 75 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 12 of 21 specs.