Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Score global
vs
Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

Leica
26 Score global

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
96
Leica
26
Budget
Panasonic
92
Leica
24
Landscape
Panasonic
90
Leica
17
Travel
Panasonic
90
Leica
14
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Leica
32
Professional
Panasonic
86
Leica
35
Portrait
Panasonic
84
Leica
53
Street
Panasonic
83
Leica
31
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
82
Leica
20

Spécifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mmLeica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm180 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm180 mm
Elements179
Groups137
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/3.5
Min Aperture4-7.1f/3.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountL-MountLeica S
Formatfull-framemedium-format
Weather Sealed
Weight0.41 kg1.15 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutomatic/manual
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm1.52 m
Max Magnification0.5x

Avantages & Inconvénients

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average build (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Prix

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

Gagnant: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi