Sigma TS-71

Sigma TS-71

Sigma
47 Score global
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Score global

Scores

Macro
Sigma
22
Panasonic
95
Budget
Sigma
48
Panasonic
91
Landscape
Sigma
29
Panasonic
91
Travel
Sigma
41
Panasonic
86
Video Cinema
Sigma
44
Panasonic
86
Professional
Sigma
41
Panasonic
84
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
41
Panasonic
82
Street
Sigma
60
Panasonic
82
Portrait
Sigma
55
Panasonic
81

Spécifications

Sigma TS-71Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min28 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm
Elements17
Groups13
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4
Min Aperture4-7.1
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountL-Mount
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.10 kg0.41 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm
Max Magnification0.5x

Avantages & Inconvénients

Sigma TS-71

  • Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Prix

Sigma TS-71 is 18 502 $MX cheaper (5.2x less).

Sigma TS-710.011score par dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.004score par dollar

Sigma TS-71 offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.8x meilleur

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Verdict

Gagnant: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi