Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm

Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm

Sigma
60 Score global
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 Score global

Scores

Budget
Sigma
51
Canon
97
Portrait
Sigma
54
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Sigma
54
Canon
90
Street
Sigma
53
Canon
82
Travel
Sigma
44
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
51
Canon
77
Landscape
Sigma
63
Canon
76
Professional
Sigma
67
Canon
75
Macro
Sigma
69
Canon
68

Spécifications

Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mmCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm135 mm
Elements1716
Groups1312
Aspherical Elements41
ED Elements11
CoatingWater- & Oil-Repellent CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.23.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades117
Build
MountL-MountCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.76 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLA-Driven High-Speed AF MotorSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm390 mm
Max Magnification1:5.30.28x

Avantages & Inconvénients

Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm

  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Verdict

Gagnant: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Meilleur pour:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports