Sony SEL1635Z

Sony SEL1635Z

Sony
77 Score global
vs
Canon 6906C002

Canon 6906C002

Canon
78 Score global

Scores

Landscape
Sony
92
Canon
90
Macro
Sony
70
Canon
86
Video Cinema
Sony
76
Canon
82
Budget
Sony
80
Canon
74
Professional
Sony
78
Canon
78
Wildlife Sports
Sony
78
Canon
74
Travel
Sony
76
Canon
77
Street
Sony
65
Canon
67
Portrait
Sony
48
Canon
48

Spécifications

Sony SEL1635ZCanon 6906C002
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm28 mm
Elements1316
Groups1213
Aspherical Elements5★2
ED Elements24★
CoatingFluorine CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/22
Min Aperturef/4f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.52 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeXD Linear Motors★STM
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops5.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance240 mm★250 mm
Max Magnification0.19x1:3.85★

Avantages & Inconvénients

Sony SEL1635Z

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (19th percentile)19th %ile

Canon 6906C002

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (77th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (22nd percentile)

Prix

Both products are similarly priced.

Sony SEL1635Z0.003score par dollar
vs
Canon 6906C0020.004score par dollar

Canon 6906C002 offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.3x meilleur

Verdict

═ Égalité

Both products are closely matched - Sony SEL1635Z wins 3 specs while Canon 6906C002 wins 5.

Sony SEL1635Z Meilleur pour:

BudgetLandscapeWildlife Sports

Canon 6906C002 Meilleur pour:

MacroVideo Cinema

A considérer aussi