Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Score global
vs
Meike 25mm f/1.8 25mm

Meike 25mm f/1.8 25mm

Meike
46 Score global

Scores

Portrait
Sigma
59
Meike
36
Budget
Sigma
56
Meike
40
Macro
Sigma
16
Meike
53
Travel
Sigma
40
Meike
50
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Meike
31
Street
Sigma
46
Meike
44
Landscape
Sigma
33
Meike
46
Professional
Sigma
42
Meike
40
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Meike
34

Spécifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSMeike 25mm f/1.8 25mm
Optics
Typewide-angle
Focal Length Min16 mm25 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm25 mm
Elements7
Groups5
Coatingmulti-layer nano optical coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperturef/1.8
Constant
Build
MountSony E
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.19 kg
Filter Thread49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm

Avantages & Inconvénients

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Meike 25mm f/1.8 25mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Gagnant: Meike 25mm f/1.8 25mm

Scores 46 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 17 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Meilleur pour:

BudgetStreetPortraitVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Meike 25mm f/1.8 25mm Meilleur pour:

MacroTravelLandscape