Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Score global
vs
Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 17mm f/0.95 17mm
Mitakon Zhongyi
43 Score global
Scores
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Spécifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 17mm f/0.95 17mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | ultra-wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 17 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/0.95 |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 8★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Micro Four Thirds |
| Weight | — | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 58 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Max Magnification | — | 0.07x★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 17mm f/0.95 17mm
- Strong aperture (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Verdict
Égalité
Both products are closely matched - Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS wins 1 specs while Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 17mm f/0.95 17mm wins 3.