Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Score global
vs
Hasselblad XCD CP.HB.00000418.01 35-75mm

Hasselblad XCD CP.HB.00000418.01 35-75mm

Hasselblad
25 Score global

Scores

Portrait
Sigma
59
Hasselblad
19
Budget
Sigma
56
Hasselblad
30
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Hasselblad
23
Street
Sigma
46
Hasselblad
27
Professional
Sigma
42
Hasselblad
26
Travel
Sigma
40
Hasselblad
28
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Hasselblad
29
Landscape
Sigma
33
Hasselblad
36
Macro
Sigma
16
Hasselblad
29

Spécifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSHasselblad XCD CP.HB.00000418.01 35-75mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm75 mm
Elements15
Groups13
Aspherical Elements2
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/32
Min Aperture3.5-4.5
Constant
Build
MountHasselblad X
Formatmedium-format
Weight1.11 kg
Filter Thread77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAuto Focus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance420 mm
Max Magnification0.118 to 0.154x

Avantages & Inconvénients

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Hasselblad XCD CP.HB.00000418.01 35-75mm

  • Strong optical (75th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (74th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average social proof (25th percentile)

Verdict

Gagnant: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 44 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 17 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Meilleur pour:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Hasselblad XCD CP.HB.00000418.01 35-75mm Meilleur pour:

MacroLandscape