Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Score global
vs
Blazar
Blazar
48 Score global
Scores
Portrait
Budget
Street
Video Cinema
Professional
Macro
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Spécifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Blazar | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 65 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 65 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.2 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/3.2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Nikon Z |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weight | — | 0.29 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 460 mm★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Blazar
- Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Verdict
Gagnant: Blazar
Scores 48 overall, wins 2 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 13 specs.