Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm
Canon
39 Score global
vs
Hasselblad
Hasselblad
35 Score global
Scores
Budget
Macro
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Spécifications
| Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm | Hasselblad | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 200 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 800 mm | 100 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 5★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/9 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | f/6.3 | 2.8-4 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Hasselblad XCD |
| Format | — | medium-format |
| Weight | 3.17 kg | 2.92 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 86 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | USM★ | stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 500 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4.0★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average build (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Hasselblad
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average social proof (13th percentile)13th %ile
Verdict
Gagnant: Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm
Scores 39 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 18 specs.