Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm
Canon
56 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
90 Score global
Scores
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Macro
Spécifications
| Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 19 |
| Groups | 7 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | Super Spectra Coating | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 4-6.3 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.17 kg★ | 0.57 kg |
| Filter Thread | 43 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 130 mm★ | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.26x | 0.28x★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
Prix
Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm0.008score par dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.005score par dollar
Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.6x meilleur
Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM 16mm
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Verdict
Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.
