Sigma 529969

Sigma 529969

Sigma
96 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Score global

Scores

Professional
Sigma
100
Nikon
95
Budget
Sigma
96
Nikon
86
Macro
Sigma
94
Nikon
85
Portrait
Sigma
93
Nikon
89
Street
Sigma
91
Nikon
86
Video Cinema
Sigma
87
Nikon
83
Landscape
Sigma
83
Nikon
83
Travel
Sigma
83
Nikon
75
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
82
Nikon
78

Spécifications

Sigma 529969Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm28 mm
Elements1613
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements43
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating and Nano Porous CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.47 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping motorStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm190 mm
Max Magnification3.3 to 4.6 x1:5.26

Avantages & Inconvénients

Sigma 529969

  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Prix

Both products are similarly priced.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

Égalité

Both products are closely matched - Sigma 529969 wins 2 specs while Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 wins 1.

Sigma 529969 Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi