Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Sony
74 Score global
vs
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm
TTArtisan
57 Score global
Scores
Travel
Landscape
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Professional
Video Cinema
Portrait
Spécifications
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II | TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 27 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 27 mm |
| Elements | 9 | — |
| Groups | 8 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/5.6 | f/27 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.11 kg★ | 0.26 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 27 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x★ | — |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong optical (69th percentile)
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm
- Strong macro (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong build (74th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average aperture (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Prix
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II0.023score par dollar
vs
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm0.019score par dollar
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.2x meilleur
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm
Verdict
Gagnant: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Scores 74 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
