Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm
Laowa
55 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28-400mm
Nikon
75 Score global
Scores
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Budget
Travel
Portrait
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Spécifications
| Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28-400mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | ultra-wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 12 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 12 mm | 400 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 21 |
| Groups | 10 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| Coating | Frog Eye Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | 22-45★ |
| Min Aperture | f/22 | 4-8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Nikon Z |
| Format | Full-Frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.61 kg★ | 0.72 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 180 mm★ | 200 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.2x | 1:2.86★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong bokeh (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong social proof (78th percentile)
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28-400mm
- Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
- Below average bokeh (26th percentile)
Verdict
Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28-400mm
Scores 75 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.