Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm

Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm

Laowa
55 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Score global

Scores

Professional
Laowa
53
Nikon
95
Portrait
Laowa
73
Nikon
89
Street
Laowa
56
Nikon
86
Budget
Laowa
51
Nikon
86
Macro
Laowa
57
Nikon
85
Landscape
Laowa
50
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Laowa
50
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Laowa
37
Nikon
78
Travel
Laowa
33
Nikon
75

Spécifications

Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeultra-wide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min12 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max12 mm28 mm
Elements1613
Groups1011
Aspherical Elements23
ED Elements33
CoatingFrog Eye CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/22f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountCanon EFNikon Z
FormatFull-Framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.61 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance180 mm190 mm
Max Magnification0.2x1:5.26

Avantages & Inconvénients

Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Prix

Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm

No current pricing available

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi