Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron
55 Score global
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
91 Score global

Scores

Travel
Tamron
50
Sony
99
Budget
Tamron
67
Sony
91
Street
Tamron
47
Sony
90
Video Cinema
Tamron
48
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
36
Sony
84
Landscape
Tamron
35
Sony
79
Portrait
Tamron
57
Sony
77
Professional
Tamron
41
Sony
77
Macro
Tamron
47
Sony
68

Spécifications

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mmSony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min16 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm50 mm
Elements—9
Groups—8
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—1★
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/3.5
Min Aperture—3.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountCanon EF-SSony E
Format—APS-C★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.54 kg0.11 kg★
Filter Thread—41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm250 mm★
Max Magnification—0.215x★

Avantages & Inconvénients

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (77th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (75th percentile)
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average build (22nd percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Prix

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

No current pricing available

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Verdict

★ Gagnant: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi