HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E

HK Meike
44 Score global
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Sony
74 Score global

Scores

Travel
HK Meike
37
Sony
88
Landscape
HK Meike
25
Sony
75
Street
HK Meike
54
Sony
74
Budget
HK Meike
46
Sony
71
Wildlife Sports
HK Meike
35
Sony
67
Professional
HK Meike
35
Sony
66
Video Cinema
HK Meike
40
Sony
64
Macro
HK Meike
21
Sony
60
Portrait
HK Meike
50
Sony
58

Spécifications

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 ESony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm50 mm
Elements—9
Groups—8
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—1★
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/5.6
Min Aperturef/23.5-5.6
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
Mount—Sony E
Format—APS-C★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.29 kg0.11 kg★
Filter Thread—41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Autofocus
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—250 mm★
Max Magnification—0.215x★

Avantages & Inconvénients

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E

  • Strong build (70th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Prix

Both products are similarly priced.

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E0.014score par dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II0.023score par dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.6x meilleur

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Verdict

★ Gagnant: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Scores 74 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi