Bose 880066-0100

Bose 880066-0100

Bose
58 Score global
vs
Beyerdynamic 1001971

Beyerdynamic 1001971

Beyerdynamic
16 Score global

Scores

Budget
Bose
64
Beyerdynamic
24
Work
Bose
63
Beyerdynamic
9
Calls
Bose
59
Beyerdynamic
7
Gaming
Bose
58
Beyerdynamic
8
Commute
Bose
55
Beyerdynamic
10
Music
Bose
48
Beyerdynamic
13
Studio
Bose
31
Beyerdynamic
13

Spécifications

Bose 880066-0100Beyerdynamic 1001971
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosed
Weight0.25 kg0.32 kg
Audio
CodecsAAC
Noise Control
ANC
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Battery
Battery Life24 hrs
Charge Time4 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 5 hours playback
ChargingUSB-C
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
AppBose Music

Avantages & Inconvénients

Bose 880066-0100

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong mic (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong anc (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average comfort (34th percentile)

Beyerdynamic 1001971

  • Below average comfort (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average mic (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average sound (24th percentile)

Prix

Both products are similarly priced.

Bose 880066-01000.006score par dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic 10019710.002score par dollar

Bose 880066-0100 offre un rapport qualité-prix 3.0x meilleur

Beyerdynamic 1001971

Verdict

Gagnant: Bose 880066-0100

Scores 58 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 21 specs.

Bose 880066-0100 Meilleur pour:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

A considérer aussi