EarFun Wave Pro HP200
EarFun
80 Score global
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Beyerdynamic
88 Score global
Ce que disent les acheteurs
EarFun Wave Pro HP200
88 sur 100 confiance faible 8 avis
Les écouteurs EarFun Wave Pro sont très appréciés pour leur excellente qualité sonore, leur réduction de bruit efficace et leur longue autonomie. Les utilisateurs soulignent le confort, la connectivité multipoint et l'égaliseur personnalisable via l'application EarFun. Quelques inconvénients mineurs incluent des oreilles chaudes lors d'une utilisation prolongée et un processus de mise à jour du firmware capricieux, mais dans l'ensemble, ils offrent un excellent rapport qualité-prix.
Points forts
- Excellente qualité sonore
- Réduction de bruit efficace
- Longue autonomie
- Confortable
- Connectivité multipoint
Points faibles
- Oreilles chaudes lors d'une utilisation prolongée
- Processus de mise à jour du firmware capricieux
- Multipoint fonctionne uniquement avec AAC, pas LDAC
Sound quality 6
Noise cancellation 6
Battery life 4
Comfort 4
Value for money 4
Multipoint connectivity 3
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Pas encore de retours clients
Scores
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
Spécifications
| EarFun Wave Pro HP200 | Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.27 kg | 0.22 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | memory foam | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | — | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 45 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 22 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | LDAC | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | QuietSmart 2.0 | Adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 80 hrs★ | 60 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 10 min for 10 hours playback | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 5★ | 2 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | EarFun App | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | ✗ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
EarFun Wave Pro HP200
- Strong battery (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong anc (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
Prix
EarFun Wave Pro HP2000.037score par dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.025score par dollar
EarFun Wave Pro HP200 offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.5x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Scores 88 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 39 specs.
