Xiaomi Poco Pad 12.1" 2509ARPBDG Blue 2025

Xiaomi Poco Pad 12.1" 2509ARPBDG Blue 2025

Xiaomi
50 Puntuación general
vs
UMIDIGI Active T1

UMIDIGI Active T1

UMIDIGI
68 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Art Design
Xiaomi
55
UMIDIGI
64
Reading
Xiaomi
59
UMIDIGI
61
Business
Xiaomi
43
UMIDIGI
60
Entertainment
Xiaomi
54
UMIDIGI
59
Student
Xiaomi
50
UMIDIGI
59
Productivity
Xiaomi
46
UMIDIGI
57

Especificaciones

Xiaomi Poco Pad 12.1" 2509ARPBDGUMIDIGI Active T1
Processor
CPUApple M1 2000 MHz
CPU Multi-Core Score
14,127
Sin datos
Cores88
GPUX1
GPU Benchmark Score59
Memory & Storage
RAM8 GB16 GB
Storage256 GB128 GB
Expandable
Display
Size12.1"11"
Resolution2560 px
Refresh Rate120 Hz
Brightness500 nits
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4Bluetooth 5.0
USB-C1
Cellular
Features
Stylus Support
Fingerprint Reader
Face Unlock
IP RatingIP68 & IP69K
Physical
Weight0.51 kg0.76 kg
OSXiaomi HyperOS 2Android

Pros y Contras

Xiaomi Poco Pad 12.1" 2509ARPBDG Blue 2025

  • Strong battery (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong screen (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong storage (75th percentile)
  • Strong ram (66th percentile)
  • Below average gpu (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (9th percentile)9th %ile

UMIDIGI Active T1

  • Strong user sentiment (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong ram (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average screen (29th percentile)

Precios

Both products are similarly priced.

Xiaomi Poco Pad 12.1" 2509ARPBDG Blue 20250.008puntos por dólar
vs
UMIDIGI Active T10.012puntos por dólar

UMIDIGI Active T1 ofrece 1.5x mejor relación calidad-precio

Xiaomi Poco Pad 12.1" 2509ARPBDG Blue 2025

UMIDIGI Active T1

Veredicto

Ganador: UMIDIGI Active T1

Scores 68 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

UMIDIGI Active T1 Mejor en:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment

También considerar