Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6"
Yattberak
30 Puntuación general
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
MSI
95 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Especificaciones
| Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6" | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 15.6" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | — | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | — | 240 Hz★ |
| Response Time | — | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 230 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | — | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 1★ |
| Speakers | — | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | — | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 75x75 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 1.13 kg★ | 8.00 kg |
Pros y Contras
Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6"
- Strong portability (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
- Below average color (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average connectivity (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average display (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average performance (22nd percentile)
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
Precios
Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6"0.020puntos por dólar
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 20260.008puntos por dólar
Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6" ofrece 2.5x mejor relación calidad-precio
Yattberak PD152KPNM 15.6"
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
Veredicto
Ganador: MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"
Scores 95 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 27 specs.
