Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 LS32BG852NNXGO 32" Black 2022
Samsung
93 Puntuación general
vs
Hosyond 10.1"
Hosyond
39 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Office
Gaming
Entertainment
Portable
Professional
Creative
Especificaciones
| Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 LS32BG852NNXGO 32" | Hosyond 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 32" | 10.1" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 1024 x 600 |
| Panel Type | VA | IPS★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | ✗ |
| Curvature | 1,000 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms★ | 4 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits★ | — |
| Color Gamut | DCI-P3 95% | — |
| Color Depth | 12-bit | — |
| HDR | Quantum HDR 2000 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | 0 |
| USB-C | 0 | 1★ |
| Thunderbolt | 0 | — |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Tilt | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Pivot | ✓★ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | — |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✓★ |
| PIP/PBP | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 8.89 kg | 0.85 kg★ |
Pros y Contras
Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 LS32BG852NNXGO 32" Black 2022
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong color (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong display (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average portability (32nd percentile)
Hosyond 10.1"
- Strong portability (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average display (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average ergonomic (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average color (18th percentile)18th %ile
Precios
Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 LS32BG852NNXGO 32" Black 20220.003puntos por dólar
vs
Hosyond 10.1"0.024puntos por dólar
Hosyond 10.1" ofrece 8.0x mejor relación calidad-precio
Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 LS32BG852NNXGO 32" Black 2022
Hosyond 10.1"
Veredicto
Ganador: Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 LS32BG852NNXGO 32"
Scores 93 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 29 specs.
