ASUS VA24DQFS
ASUS
64 Puntuación general
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED 27" Metallic Black 2024
MSI
86 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Office
Gaming
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Especificaciones
| ASUS VA24DQFS | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 23.8" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 100 Hz | 360 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | Adaptive-Sync | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits★ | 250 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | 98% Adobe RGB / 99.1% DCI-P3 / 138.4% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 8-bit | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | Yes | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 2★ | 1 |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Power | 11W★ | — |
| Weight | 5.08 kg★ | 8.00 kg |
Pros y Contras
ASUS VA24DQFS
- Strong connectivity (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong portability (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong feature (72nd percentile)
- Below average display (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (33rd percentile)
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED 27" Metallic Black 2024
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile
Precios
ASUS VA24DQFS0.017puntos por dólar
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED 27" Metallic Black 20240.007puntos por dólar
ASUS VA24DQFS ofrece 2.4x mejor relación calidad-precio
ASUS VA24DQFS
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED 27" Metallic Black 2024
Veredicto
Ganador: MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED 27"
Scores 86 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 28 specs.
