ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
ASUS
100 Puntuación general
vs
SKitphrati S-17-W 17" Black
SKitphrati
35 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Especificaciones
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" | SKitphrati S-17-W 17" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 17" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1440 x 900 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | TN |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 75 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 5 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | 250 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | — |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | 0 |
| USB-C | 2★ | 0 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Pivot | ✓★ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 75x75 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 25W★ | — |
| Weight | 6.70 kg | 2.38 kg★ |
Pros y Contras
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
SKitphrati S-17-W 17" Black
- Strong portability (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Below average display (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average color (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (28th percentile)
Precios
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 20240.009puntos por dólar
vs
SKitphrati S-17-W 17" Black0.018puntos por dólar
SKitphrati S-17-W 17" Black ofrece 2.0x mejor relación calidad-precio
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
SKitphrati S-17-W 17" Black
Veredicto
Ganador: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27"
Scores 100 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 28 specs.
