ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
ASUS
100 Puntuación general
vs
LG UL3J-M 43UL3J-M 43"
LG
52 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Especificaciones
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" | LG UL3J-M 43UL3J-M 43" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 43" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 8 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 80% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 10-bit | 10-bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 3★ |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | 0 |
| USB-C | 2★ | 0 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Tilt | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Pivot | ✓★ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 200x200 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 25W★ | 80W |
| Weight | 6.70 kg★ | 8.80 kg |
Pros y Contras
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
LG UL3J-M 43UL3J-M 43"
- Strong display (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong color (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average performance (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
- Below average portability (25th percentile)
- Below average ergonomic (35th percentile)
Precios
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 20240.009puntos por dólar
vs
LG UL3J-M 43UL3J-M 43"0.005puntos por dólar
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024 ofrece 1.8x mejor relación calidad-precio
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
LG UL3J-M 43UL3J-M 43"
Veredicto
Ganador: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27"
Scores 100 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 28 specs.
