Sigma 33B965

Sigma 33B965

Sigma
73 Puntuación general
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Professional
Sigma
64
Nikon
90
Macro
Sigma
73
Nikon
88
Street
Sigma
86
Nikon
85
Budget
Sigma
66
Nikon
86
Portrait
Sigma
75
Nikon
83
Landscape
Sigma
49
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
66
Nikon
83
Travel
Sigma
56
Nikon
74
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
61
Nikon
74

Especificaciones

Sigma 33B965Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typestandardzoom
Focal Length Min30 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max30 mm28 mm
Elements—13
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements23★
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant—✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatmicro-four-thirdsfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.14 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motor★Stepping Motor
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:8.11:5.26

Pros y Contras

Sigma 33B965

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile

Precios

Sigma 33B965

No current pricing available

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Veredicto

★ Ganador: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Mejor en:

MacroBudgetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

También considerar