Technics EAH-AZ100 vs Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Puntuación general
vs
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
Skullcandy
35 Puntuación general
Lo que dicen los compradores
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 de 100 confianza media 28 reseñas
Los auriculares Technics EAH-AZ100 son ampliamente elogiados por su excepcional calidad de sonido, con graves profundos, agudos nítidos y audio inmersivo. La comodidad, la duración de la batería y la cancelación de ruido también son frecuentemente destacadas, aunque algunos usuarios señalan el alto precio y el volumen limitado. Se mencionaron problemas menores como desconexiones de Bluetooth LE y emparejamiento inicial con múltiples dispositivos, pero el sentimiento general es muy positivo.
Ventajas
- Calidad de sonido excepcional
- Graves profundos e inmersivos
- Cancelación de ruido efectiva
- Ajuste cómodo
- Excelente duración de batería
Desventajas
- Precio alto
- Volumen máximo limitado
- Desconexiones Bluetooth LE
- Problemas de emparejamiento multi-dispositivo
- Exterior de plástico
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
Sin opiniones de clientes aún
Puntuaciones
Calls
Travel
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Budget
Especificaciones
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 22 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | Skullcandy Grind Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth Headphones, Up to 40 Hours Battery, Noise Isolating Fit, Microphone for iPhone Android, Customizable via Skull-iQ App - Light Grey/Blue |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.0 |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 40 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs | 40 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Alexa |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | Skull-iQ App |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | Water-Resistant |
Pros y Contras
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
- Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (71st percentile)
- Strong connectivity (69th percentile)
- Below average mic (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average comfort (27th percentile)
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
- Below average affordability (34th percentile)
Precios
Technics EAH-AZ1000.012puntos por dólar
vs
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P7510.046puntos por dólar
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751 ofrece 3.8x mejor relación calidad-precio
Veredicto
Ganador: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 39 specs.
