Intel Core Ultra 265K 20-core LGA1851

Intel Core Ultra 265K 20-core LGA1851

Intel
82 Puntuación general
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER
66 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Productivity
Intel
88
MICRO CENTER
74
Ai Llm
Intel
84
MICRO CENTER
56
Efficiency
Intel
77
MICRO CENTER
65
Budget
Intel
76
MICRO CENTER
59
Gaming
Intel
76
MICRO CENTER
61
Server
Intel
75
MICRO CENTER
54

Especificaciones

Intel Core Ultra 265KMICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Processor
BrandIntel—
SeriesCore Ultra 7—
Model265K—
CodenameArrow Lake—
Classdesktop—
Process3★—
Cores & Clocks
Cores20★—
P-cores8★—
E-cores12★—
Threads20★—
Base Clock
3,900
Sin datos
Boost Clock
5,500
Sin datos
Cache
L2 Cache24★—
L3 Cache30★—
Performance
PassMark Multi
58,572
70,111
PassMark Single
4,929
4,737
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★—
Max Speed
6,400
Sin datos
Channels2★—
Max Memory
256
Sin datos
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1851—
PCIe5.0—
PCIe Lanes20★—
TDP125★—
Max Turbo Power250★—
Unlocked✓★—
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU—

Pros y Contras

Intel Core Ultra 265K 20-core LGA1851

  • Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong platform (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong ai (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Below average affordability (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average social proof (25th percentile)

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

  • Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average feature (21st percentile)

Precios

Intel Core Ultra 265K 20-core LGA1851

No current pricing available

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

Veredicto

★ Ganador: Intel Core Ultra 265K

Scores 82 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 19 of 28 specs.

Intel Core Ultra 265K Mejor en:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

También considerar