Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"

Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"

Samsung
94 Overall Score
vs
KTC H27T13 32"

KTC H27T13 32"

KTC
37 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

Overall, users are highly satisfied with this Samsung Neo QLED TV, praising its exceptional picture quality, brightness, and contrast. The AI features and easy setup are also highlighted as major positives. Some minor issues were noted, such as difficulty connecting external devices and a desire for louder volume, but these do not overshadow the overall positive sentiment.

Pros
  • Exceptional picture quality
  • Brightness and contrast
  • AI features
  • Easy setup
  • Smooth motion handling
Cons
  • Finicky external device connection
  • Volume could be louder
  • Heavy, needs two people to move
👍 Picture quality 7
👍 Brightness contrast 4
👍 Ai features 2
👍 Ease of setup 3
🤔 Sound quality 3
👎 Connectivity 1

KTC H27T13 32"

82 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The KTC monitor delivers impressive picture quality and value, especially after calibration. Users praise its vibrant colors, high brightness, and HDR performance, though some note out-of-the-box settings need adjustment. A few reviewers experienced backlight bleed or flickering at high refresh rates, but overall satisfaction is high for the price.

Pros
  • Vibrant colors after calibration
  • Excellent HDR performance
  • High brightness
  • Great value for money
  • Good response time
Cons
  • Backlight bleed on some units
  • Flickering at 144Hz
  • Artifacts at 160Hz
  • Height not adjustable
  • No OSD software for Windows
👍 Color quality 8
👍 Brightness 6
👍 Value for money 7
🤔 Hdr performance 4
👎 Refresh rate issues 3
👍 Build quality 4

Scores

Sports
Samsung
94
KTC
35
Streaming
Samsung
93
KTC
30
Budget
Samsung
93
KTC
43
Smart Home
Samsung
91
KTC
27
Corporate
Samsung
89
KTC
23
Gaming
Samsung
88
KTC
45
Movies
Samsung
82
KTC
24
Outdoor
Samsung
77
KTC
21
Portable
Samsung
60
KTC
35

Specifications

Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"KTC H27T13 32"
Display
Size100"27"
Resolution4K★2560 x 1440
Panel TypeMini-LED★IPS
BacklightMini-LED★—
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved✗—
Picture Quality
Brightness1000 nits★—
Contrast Ratioinfinite—
Color GamutNot Specified by Manufacturer100% High Color Gamut, 123% sRGB
Color Depth10-bit★—
Motion TechMotion Xcelerator 144Hz—
ProcessorNQ4 AI Gen2 Processor—
HDR
HDR FormatsHDR10, HDR10+, HLGHDR10
Dolby Vision✗✗
HDR10+✓★✗
HLG✓★✗
Gaming
Refresh Rate120 Hz★100 Hz
VRRFreeSync Premium Pro, Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)FreeSync, G-Sync
ALLM✓★—
Game Mode✓✓
Smart TV
PlatformTizen—
Voice AssistantAlexa—
Screen MirroringSmartThings—
Works WithAlexa—
Audio
Speaker Config4.0—
Wattage30W★—
Dolby Atmos✓★—
Surround SoundDolby Atmos—
eARC✓★—
Connectivity
HDMI Ports4★2
HDMI Version2.1★—
USB Ports23★
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5—
Bluetooth5.3★—
Ethernet✓★—
Optical Audio✓★—
VESA Mount600x400—
Power & Size
Power175W★—
Energy Star✗—
Annual Energy662 kWh★—
Weight60.28 kg4.30 kg★

Pros & Cons

Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"

  • Strong display (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong hdr (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong picture quality (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile

KTC H27T13 32"

  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong gaming (67th percentile)
  • Below average audio (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average smart (14th percentile)14th %ile

Pricing

KTC H27T13 32" is MX$138,104 cheaper (32.1x less).

Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"0.001score per dollar
vs
KTC H27T13 32"0.008score per dollar

KTC H27T13 32" offers 8.0x better value for money

Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"

KTC H27T13 32"

Verdict

★ Winner: Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"

Scores 94 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 19 of 41 specs.

Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100" Better at:

BudgetGamingMoviesSportsOutdoorPortableCorporateStreamingSmart Home

Also Consider