ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025
ICONLINK
40 Overall Score
vs
QDDQ TB02 10" TAB9 Pink 2025
QDDQ
68 Overall Score
Scores
Business
Art Design
Student
Productivity
Reading
Entertainment
Specifications
| ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M | QDDQ TB02 10" TAB9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | Unisoc | 2 GHz |
| Cores | 4 | 8★ |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB★ |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB★ |
| Storage Type | — | eMMC★ |
| Expandable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 10.1" | 10" |
| Panel | IPS | IPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.0★ |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Cellular | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | — | ✓★ |
| Face Unlock | — | ✓★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.97 kg★ | 1.35 kg |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
Pros & Cons
ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025
- Below average feature (27th percentile)
- Below average ram (32th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (32th percentile)
QDDQ TB02 10" TAB9 Pink 2025
- Strong feature (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong cpu (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong gpu (80th percentile)80th %ile
Pricing
ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 20250.032score per dollar
vs
QDDQ TB02 10" TAB9 Pink 20250.038score per dollar
QDDQ TB02 10" TAB9 Pink 2025 offers 1.2x better value for money
ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Pink 2025
QDDQ TB02 10" TAB9 Pink 2025
Verdict
Winner: QDDQ TB02 10" TAB9
Scores 68 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 16 specs.
