Lexar NS100

Lexar NS100

Lexar
36 Overall Score
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R

Seagate FireCuda 530R

Seagate
92 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Lexar NS100

72 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

Most users are very satisfied with this 128GB SSD, praising its value for money, especially for upgrading older systems. One reviewer had a defective unit that failed diagnostics, but others found it a hidden gem. Overall, it's recommended for budget-conscious upgrades.

Pros
  • Great value for money
  • Fast for older systems
  • Easy upgrade for old PCs
  • Recommended by users
Cons
  • Defective unit risk
  • Failed diagnostics for one unit
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Performance 2
🤔 Reliability 2
👍 Ease of installation 1
👍 Recommendation 2

Seagate FireCuda 530R

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

This SSD is praised for its exceptional durability and high endurance, with a 5-year warranty and Rescue Services adding peace of mind. Users highlight its blazing-fast sequential read and write speeds, which are ideal for gaming and heavy workloads. The support for DirectStorage is a plus for modern gaming setups. However, some users note that compatibility with all computers may not be guaranteed, so checking system requirements is advised.

Pros
  • 5-year warranty
  • Rescue Services included
  • High endurance (5,050TBW)
  • Fast sequential read/write
  • DirectStorage support
Cons
  • Compatibility not guaranteed
  • May not fit all computers
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

Scores

Laptop
Lexar
35
Seagate
93
Budget
Lexar
43
Seagate
89
Gaming
Lexar
23
Seagate
88
Console
Lexar
11
Seagate
85
Workstation
Lexar
40
Seagate
84
Portable
Lexar
8
Seagate
24

Specifications

Lexar NS100Seagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
256
4,000
Form Factor2.5"M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—4★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
550
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)No data
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDMLC★TLC
DRAM Cache—✗
Controller—E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
128
5,050
MTBF (hours)No data
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink—✗

Pros & Cons

Lexar NS100

  • Strong endurance (74th percentile)
  • Strong feature (71st percentile)
  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average speed (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (28th percentile)

Seagate FireCuda 530R

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 92 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 17 specs.

Seagate FireCuda 530R Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation