Crucial T710

Crucial T710

Crucial
95 Overall Score
vs
Kingston A400

Kingston A400

Kingston
43 Overall Score

Scores

Console
Crucial
95
Kingston
17
Budget
Crucial
95
Kingston
61
Gaming
Crucial
93
Kingston
33
Workstation
Crucial
88
Kingston
37
Laptop
Crucial
82
Kingston
44
Portable
Crucial
26
Kingston
11

Specifications

Crucial T710Kingston A400
Drive
Capacity
4,000
960
Form FactorM.2 22802.5"
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4SATA III
ProtocolNVMeSATA
PCIe Generation5★—
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,500
500
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,800
450
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
No data
Random Write (IOPS)
2,300,000
No data
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllerMicronMarvell 88SS1074
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
2,400
300
MTBF (hours)
1,500,000
1,000,000
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✗✗

Pros & Cons

Crucial T710

  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile

Kingston A400

  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Below average speed (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Crucial T710

Scores 95 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

Crucial T710 Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation