SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk
90 Overall Score
vs
Crucial BX500

Crucial BX500

Crucial
58 Overall Score

Scores

Console
SanDisk
86
Crucial
24
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Crucial
51
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Crucial
46
Budget
SanDisk
72
Crucial
80
Laptop
SanDisk
66
Crucial
59
Portable
SanDisk
24
Crucial
16

Specifications

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Crucial BX500
Drive
Capacity
8,000
2,000
Form FactorM.2 22802.5"
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4SATA III
ProtocolNVMeSATA
PCIe Generation5★—
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
540
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
500
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
No data
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
No data
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
720
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
1,500,000
Warranty (years)5★3
Features
Heatsink✓★✗
Hardware Encryption✓★✗

Pros & Cons

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

Crucial BX500

  • Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong capacity (78th percentile)
  • Strong endurance (70th percentile)
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average speed (25th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Better at:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Crucial BX500 Better at:

Budget